Ontario doctor uses lottery to reduce his patient load

Canadian doctor shortage leads to cherry-picking patients.

Excerpts from an article by Tom Blackwell, National Post August 5, 2008

In the latest jarring illustration of the country's doctor shortage, a family physician in Northern Ontario has used a lottery to determine which patients would be ejected from his overloaded practice.

Dr. Ken Runciman says he reluctantly eliminated about 100 patients in two separate draws to avoid having to provide assembly-line service or extend already onerous work hours, and admits the move has divided the close-knit community of Powassan.

Yet it was not the first time such methods have been employed to determine medical service. A new family practice in Newfoundland held a lottery last month to pick its caseload from among thousands of applicants. An Edmonton doctor selected names randomly earlier this year to pare 500 people from his heavy caseload. And in Ontario, regulators have heard reports of a number of other physicians also using draws to choose, or remove, patients.

"It was just my way of trying to minimize the bias ... rather than going through the list and saying 'I don't like you, and I don't like you,' " said Dr. Runciman. "It wasn't something that I wanted to do."

The unusual practice seems to be a symptom of the times, said Jill Hefley, spokeswoman for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. A paucity of medical professionals has left an estimated five million Canadians without a family doctor.

Ms. Hefley cited a family practitioner in Chatham, Ont., who recently informed all the patients he had not seen in the previous two years that he was dropping them from the practice so he could take on new patients with more medical need.

"There's all kinds of ways that doctors are trying to deal with their patient loads," she said.

Dr. Runciman held two lotteries, the latest one trimming about 25 patients, with letters going out in July.

He said he is not willing to rapidly rotate people through for five-minute appointments, virtually the only way to handle such a large caseload. He prefers to give patients 15 to 20 minutes of holistic care.

"There is only a certain number of people I can see in a day. My day is already 11 hours and I don't care for it being longer," he said. "I realize that, at 47, I can't run my ass off like I did 20 years ago."

In Gander, Nfld., two new doctors setting up practice held a lottery last month to choose patients from among approximately 4,000 applicants, hoping to avoid the mob scenes that greeted the last new physician to arrive in town.

Last March, an overworked Edmonton family doctor who was also chief medical information officer for the local health region picked names randomly to cut 500 people from his practice.

Dr. Trevor Theman, registrar for the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons, said yesterday that the physician opted for the fairest way to shrink his practice, and did so for legitimate reasons. Patients can expect more of the same, he said.

"We have the Baby Boomer bulge of physicians and they're ageing," Dr. Theman said. "I would think over time we will see physicians who cut back their practices or elect to do other things for a variety of reasons, and they'll need some method to manage that."

The full text of the article is here.

Health care costs for Americans to rise 5.7% in 2009

Canadian doctor shortage leads to cherry-picking patients.

IMTA responds to rising trend of ad hoc “accreditors”

IMTA responds to AMA first ever guidelines on medical tourism.

99-year-old New York woman undergoes successful heart surgery.